50
Motorola RAZR V3xx
$140.00
Released March, 2007
The Pros:Good video playback support (lots of formats, smooth playback). High speed HSDPA data connectivity. Good call quality in terms of both audio received (speaker) and microphone.
The Cons:Attractive but annoying to use dialpad, buttons are once piece, requires alot of force to activate. Poor user interface than have not been updated for years. Limited accessories for multimedia (headset, video output, poor music applications).
The Motorola RAZR V3xx is the first of the RAZR line to be 3G compatible. It is versatile with numerous functions and features. Its body is roughly the same as previous versions of the RAZR. It also caters to those who like to use multimedia with their phone, as it has a 1.3-megapixel camera, mp3 player, video capture and playback, and allows for video downloading.
Loading latest prices from ProductWiki...
It also includes an Opera web browser and wireless Bluetooth 2.0 connectivity. A secondary VGA camera enables video calling as well. Internal memory is 50MB, with a microSD slot for expansion. The V3xx is built to bring the features of the older RAZR phone into competition with the emergent 3G market.
Features
- Release Date: March 2007
- 3G HSDPA 850/1900, data HSDPA 3.6Mbps
- 2G GSM 900/1800/1900
- 1.3-megapixel digital camera with video capture/playback
- Alternate VGA camera for video calling
- Bluetooth V2.0
- SMS, EMS, MMS, e-mail, instant messaging
- mp3 player and video downloading
- 50MB internal memory, microSD expansion card slot
- Up to 3 hours talk time battery life
- Thin, low-profile design
User Reviews (1)
Pros & Cons
-
1
Good video playback support (lots of formats, smooth playback)
-
1
High speed HSDPA data connectivity
-
1
Good call quality in terms of both audio received (speaker) and microphone
-
1
Wide range of calling features (speaker phone, contact access)
-
1
Offers good improvements over the original RAZR (battery life, signal quality)
-
1
Attractive but annoying to use dialpad, buttons are once piece, requires alot of force to activate
-
1
Poor user interface than have not been updated for years
-
1
Limited accessories for multimedia (headset, video output, poor music applications)
-
1
Battery life improved over the original model, but still poor compared to other flip phones in the same price range (from Nokia, Samsung)
-
1
Camera quality for both pictures and video remains poor, like its predecessor
Community Reviews
see more community reviews
From your Computer
From the Web
Comments (0)
helpful
Read the full review
You may also like...
